Inconsistency, Uncertainty and Epistemic Authority

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Fundamentalism and Epistemic Authority

I will discuss three questions in my paper: 1. What are the essential elements of fundamentalism? 2. What is the role of authority as a source of fundamentalism? 3. What is the role of trust in the spreading of fundamentalism? For each question I will outline a possible answer from a special theoretical point of view. What is " fundamentalism " ? There is an ongoing discussion about this questi...

متن کامل

Negotiating Epistemic Authority

Why do we trust what other people say, and form beliefs on the basis of their speech? One answer: they are taken to have epistemic authority. Intuitively this means that the other person (or institution, or group) is taken to be authoritative in what they say, at least with respect to a particular domain. Here, we want to claim that there are (at least) two varieties of epistemic authority, one...

متن کامل

Robustness-based portfolio optimization under epistemic uncertainty

In this paper, we propose formulations and algorithms for robust portfolio optimization under both aleatory uncertainty (i.e., natural variability) and epistemic uncertainty (i.e., imprecise probabilistic information) arising from interval data. Epistemic uncertainty is represented using two approaches: (1) moment bounding approach and (2) likelihood-based approach. This paper first proposes a ...

متن کامل

Anticipation, Uncertainty, and Time Inconsistency

We extend expected utility theory to situations in which agents experience feelings of anticipation at dates prior to the resolution of uncertainty. We show how these anticipatory feelings may result in time inconsistency. We provide examples to show the impact of anticipation on decision making.

متن کامل

Deliberative Modality under Epistemic Uncertainty

It is standard practice in linguistic semantics to treat a modal like ought as expressing quantification over possible worlds that are selected and ranked according to certain contextual parameters (Kratzer, 1977, 1981, 1991, 2012). On this view, different modal flavors correspond to different values for these contextual parameters. In the following, we will call the particular modal flavor at ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion

سال: 2014

ISSN: 1689-8311

DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v6i4.151